Thursday, November 22, 2012

Happy Thanksgiving

I hope you all have a wonderful Thanksgiving.

I am thankful for so many things I could not possibly list them all.

I am thankful to live in this country were we are free to worship.

I am thankful for my family.

I am thankful for the material bounty that surrounds me.

I am thankful for the opportunity to express my views and

I am thankful for readers, with a special thanks to those who comment and share ideas with our little community.

The real story of Thanksgiving is a great story and worth reading again.

The Real Story of Thanksgiving
Rush Limbaugh

On August 1, 1620, the Mayflower set sail. It carried a total of 102 passengers, including forty Pilgrims led by William Bradford. On the journey, Bradford set up an agreement, a contract, that established just and equal laws for all members of the new community, irrespective of their religious beliefs.

Where did the revolutionary ideas expressed in the Mayflower Compact come from? From the Bible. The Pilgrims were a people completely steeped in the lessons of the Old and New Testaments. They looked to the ancient Israelites for their example. And, because of the biblical precedents set forth in Scripture, they never doubted that their experiment would work.

"But this was no pleasure cruise, friends. The journey to the New World was a long and arduous one. And when the Pilgrims landed in New England in November, they found, according to Bradford's detailed journal, a cold, barren, desolate wilderness," destined to become the home of the Kennedy family. "There were no friends to greet them, he wrote. There were no houses to shelter them. There were no inns where they could refresh themselves. And the sacrifice they had made for freedom was just beginning.

During the first winter, half the Pilgrims – including Bradford's own wife – died of either starvation, sickness or exposure.

"When spring finally came, Indians taught the settlers how to plant corn, fish for cod and skin beavers for coats." Yes, it was Indians that taught the white man how to skin beasts. "Life improved for the Pilgrims, but they did not yet prosper! This is important to understand because this is where modern American history lessons often end. "Thanksgiving is actually explained in some textbooks as a holiday for which the Pilgrims gave thanks to the Indians for saving their lives, rather than as a devout expression of gratitude grounded in the tradition of both the Old and New Testaments.

Here is the part [of Thanksgiving] that has been omitted: The original contract the Pilgrims had entered into with their merchant-sponsors in London called for everything they produced to go into a common store, and each member of the community was entitled to one common share.

"All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belong to the community as well. They were going to distribute it equally. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belonged to the community as well. Nobody owned anything. They just had a share in it. It was a commune, folks. It was the forerunner to the communes we saw in the '60s and '70s out in California – and it was complete with organic vegetables, by the way.

Bradford, who had become the new governor of the colony, recognized that this form of collectivism was as costly and destructive to the Pilgrims as that first harsh winter, which had taken so many lives.

He decided to take bold action. Bradford assigned a plot of land to each family to work and manage, thus turning loose the power of the marketplace.

"That's right. Long before Karl Marx was even born, the Pilgrims had discovered and experimented with what could only be described as socialism. And what happened?

It didn't work! Surprise, surprise, huh?

What Bradford and his community found was that the most creative and industrious people had no incentive to work any harder than anyone else, unless they could utilize the power of personal motivation!

But while most of the rest of the world has been experimenting with socialism for well over a hundred years – trying to refine it, perfect it, and re-invent it – the Pilgrims decided early on to scrap it permanently.

What Bradford wrote about this social experiment should be in every schoolchild's history lesson. If it were, we might prevent much needless suffering in the future.

"'The experience that we had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years...that by taking away property, and bringing community into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing – as if they were wiser than God,' Bradford wrote. 'For this community [so far as it was] was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense...that was thought injustice.'

Why should you work for other people when you can't work for yourself? What's the point?

"Do you hear what he was saying, ladies and gentlemen? The Pilgrims found that people could not be expected to do their best work without incentive. So what did Bradford's community try next? They unharnessed the power of good old free enterprise by invoking the undergirding capitalistic principle of private property.

Every family was assigned its own plot of land to work and permitted to market its own crops and products. And what was the result?

'This had very good success,' wrote Bradford, 'for it made all hands industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been.'

Bradford doesn't sound like much of a... liberal Democrat, "does he? Is it possible that supply-side economics could have existed before the 1980s? Yes.

"Read the story of Joseph and Pharaoh in Genesis 41. Following Joseph's suggestion (Gen 41:34), Pharaoh reduced the tax on Egyptians to 20% during the 'seven years of plenty' and the 'Earth brought forth in heaps.' (Gen. 41:47)

In no time, the Pilgrims found they had more food than they could eat themselves.... So they set up trading posts and exchanged goods with the Indians. The profits allowed them to pay off their debts to the merchants in London.

And the success and prosperity of the Plymouth settlement attracted more Europeans and began what came to be known as the 'Great Puritan Migration.'"

Now, other than on this program every year, have you heard this story before? Is this lesson being taught to your kids today -- and if it isn't, why not? Can you think of a more important lesson one could derive from the pilgrim experience?

So in essence there was, thanks to the Indians, because they taught us how to skin beavers and how to plant corn when we arrived, but the real Thanksgiving was thanking the Lord for guidance and plenty -- and once they reformed their system and got rid of the communal bottle and started what was essentially free market capitalism, they produced more than they could possibly consume, and they invited the Indians to dinner, and voila, we got Thanksgiving, and that's what it was: inviting the Indians to dinner and giving thanks for all the plenty is the true story of Thanksgiving.

4 comments:

  1. Well, as I was reading this most interesting essay, I was thinking "I should copy this and send it to folks on my mailing list". Then I was mentally going through my address book deciding who to send it to. I thought "Gene would love this!!". . . Then I realized --- It is on Gene's Blog.....

    See I really am not as smart as I am good looking.

    dean0

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have a book published in 1875. It is a school book; it's history for 5th graders (about). In discussing the new settlements in MA and VA, it describes how those early settlers had all their farms in common. They all worked and shared their harvests, etc. Very quickly they realized that the industrious were doing most of the work, but the lazy were eating a completely equal share, leading everyone to be in want. The situation grew worse, mass starvation was happening, and total collapse was imminent. That "Dying Time" forced the settlers to change. They decided to divide the land among the men and families, allowing each to work his own land and to keep his own harvests. Prosperity increased and mass starvation was no longer a fear.
    If they had persisted in spite of the terrible reality and the colony had failed, would we have ever been a free nation?

    By the way Dictionary.com gives the first meaning of FASTIDIOUS as: "Possessing or displaying careful, meticulous attention to detail."

    ReplyDelete
  3. gmw,

    Isn't it strange how as many times "collectivism" (also: communism, socialism, Obamaism, etc) has been tried and failed, there are those who will try it again. Their attempt at rationalizing this is usually, to the effect, that previous failures just weren't sociallistic enough. I once knew a Liberal who not only subscribed to that notion but who also thought that all jobs,say from garbage collection to neuro-surgery, should be paid exactly the same! Liberalism is a MENTAL ILLNESS and America is becoming very, very SICK!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mental illness is right; an inability to accept reality and act accordingly.
    Strange indeed. People will hold on to an illusion of control even if it kills them. These same people don't actually want control, that is too much responsibility.

    ReplyDelete

All points of view are welcome, but comments with excessive bad language and/or personal attacks will be deleted. Commenting on posts older than 5 days has been disabled.